Australian Senate passes plain cigarette package law

Proposed Australian plain cigarette pack

(Thanks to Classical Gas for the scoop on this story!)

Australia is attempting to force cigarette companies in that country to have utterly, entirely plain cigarette packages, with no artwork, no logos, no graphics whatsoever, except for graphic images of lung cancer and other diseases caused by cigarette smoking.

The Australian Senate passed a bill to require the plain packages. The Australian House is expected to approve the bill, as well, requiring plain packaging by next year. Tobacco companies are expected to file lawsuits. New Zealand is considering similar legislation.

In the U.S., these graphic warnings have been put on hold. A U.S. District Court judge issued an injunction stopping the FDA from requiring graphic warnings, saying they violated tobacco companies’ First Amendment rights by forcing them to advocate for something they didn’t want to advocate.

French cigaratte pack

Someone showed me a pack of French cigarettes the other day with a pretty gross graphic warning of a rotting mouth. Their point was smokers really aren’t going to pay attention. My attitude is the vast majority of smokers probably don’t care about the warnings — I mean if they’re smoking, they’re probably already addicted to the nicotine. But, maybe, maybe, maybe, just maybe, it will put an inkling in a few smokers’ minds that, “Wow, I really need to quit,” and maybe, maybe, maybe, it will discourage some kids from beginning. Who knows? I can hear the nanny-state argument on this one.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Anti-tobacco campaign, Australia, cigarette advertising, cigarettes, FDA, New Zealand, warning labels and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Australian Senate passes plain cigarette package law

  1. Lizard Island says:

    That would be cool if they passed this. It will never happen in the states unfortunately because of all the lobbying that would attempt to kill it.

  2. Pepe Lepew says:

    Yeah, I think it’s dead in the U.S. because of the Constitutional issues.

    I believe it is a done deal in Australia; it’s all about whether the courts will uphold it.

  3. Pingback: Margaret Chan apprezza il “pacchetto di sigarette anonimo” dell’Australia « Contro il tabagismo

  4. Pingback: Why I voted Yes on California’s Prop. 29 | Personal Website of Phillip Gresham

  5. Pingback: Margaret Chan apprezza il “pacchetto di sigarette anonimo” dell’Australia | Contro il tabagismo

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s